How do they compare?
ThreatLocker isn't weaker antivirus — it's a different model: default-deny application allowlisting that blocks the unknown instead of chasing it. That power comes with real, ongoing policy work someone has to own, and it still isn't email security, identity protection, or a single bill.
30 minutes · nothing to install · you keep the assessment either way
We're not here to argue allowlisting is wrong
ThreatLocker's Application Control model — block everything by default, allow only what's approved — is a genuinely more restrictive approach than signature-based AV, and ThreatLocker itself recommends running it alongside an EDR/AV engine, not instead of one. The real cost is operational: every allow-rule is a decision someone has to make and maintain.
ThreatLocker controls what can execute on a device. It has no native email security and no identity threat detection for Entra ID or Okta account compromise — those get sourced from other vendors, separately.
Independent reviews describe a 60–90+ day ramp to operational proficiency, and cases of MSPs accumulating hundreds of policies that became difficult to manage. The model is sound; the question is who authors and maintains the ruleset indefinitely.
Cyber Hero provides 24/7 support for application-approval requests as part of the core product — genuinely useful. Full managed detection and response to Detect module alerts (Cyber Hero MDR) is a separate add-on layered on top, not bundled by default.
The core five-module bundle (Allowlisting, Ringfencing, Elevation Control, Storage Control, Network Control) is solid — but Patch Management, Web Control, Cloud Control, ZTNA, and MDR are each separate, additionally priced modules.
Three reasons to choose EntraGuard over — or alongside — ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker secures what runs on the device; it doesn't cover email, identity, or dark-web exposure natively. EntraGuard bundles EDR containment with identity, email, patch, dark-web, and training under one plan.
ThreatLocker's own reviewers point to a real ramp period and ongoing policy governance to avoid alert fatigue. EntraGuard's model puts a managed SOC on that ongoing tuning and triage work as part of the plan.
ThreatLocker's dashboards give configuration-risk visibility scoped to the endpoint layer. EntraGuard rolls the full stack into a single board-ready posture score and a single invoice — a simpler governance story for a regulated SMB that answers to an auditor, not just an IT admin.
See what's still uncovered — identity, email, dark-web exposure, training — and what a 24/7 team to run the whole thing looks like in one plan.
Every layer ThreatLocker leaves for you to source
Managed 24/7 — contained, not just flagged.
Risk-based access, monitored continuously.
SPF/DKIM/DMARC enforced and watched.
Patched and verified, not just installed.
Credential exposure caught before it's used.
Run, tracked, and measured — not a checkbox.
Evidence collected continuously, mapped to your framework.
Our analysts, not a dashboard you're left to read.
Every device enrolled and accounted for.
From EntraGuard clients
"Within thirty days, EntraGuard had rolled out an impressive security program that immediately identified and remediated active vulnerabilities and threats."Noah R. — COO, Staffing & Recruiting Firm
"We have been a happy client since 2009. HIPAA was a breeze — the requirements actually fall short of the policies and protection we already had in place, thanks to them."Glen B. — President, NY-area Medical Practices
"EntraGuard has significantly improved our cybersecurity program. Our compliance efforts are now stronger, with more effective management of cybersecurity."James C. — CFO, NY-area Publishing Company
EntraGuard vs. ThreatLocker, 2026
ThreatLocker's allowlisting and compliance-gap dashboard are genuine strengths, scored accordingly. This isn't "allowlisting vs. no allowlisting" — many regulated clients run both models together.
| Capability | EntraGuard | ThreatLocker |
|---|---|---|
| Next-gen antivirus & EDR | Included, managed | Detect module runs alongside EDR/AV, not in place of it |
| 24/7 managed threat hunting & response | Included, every plan | Cyber Hero MDR is a paid add-on, not default |
| Threats contained, not just alerted | Default behavior | Default-deny blocks unapproved execution by design |
| Identity threat protection | Included | No native Entra ID/Okta compromise detection |
| Email security | Included | Not offered |
| Patch & device management | Included | Patch Management is a separate add-on module |
| Dark-web credential monitoring | Included | Not a native capability |
| Security-awareness training | Included & measured | Admin/product training only, no end-user phishing sim |
| Continuous compliance evidence | Included | DAC dashboard maps configs to NIST, CMMC, HIPAA |
| Single posture score | One number, board-ready | Endpoint-config risk score, not whole-stack |
| A team running it for you | Included, every plan | Cyber Hero helps approvals; policy authorship stays on you |
| One vendor, one bill | Yes | Core bundle plus per-module add-ons |
ThreatLocker markets its Detect module to run "alongside EDR/AV," not replace it. Cyber Hero MDR (full managed detection and response to Detect alerts) is a separate add-on to the core allowlisting bundle. ThreatLocker's Defense Against Configurations (DAC) dashboard maps endpoint configuration to compliance frameworks including NIST, CMMC, and HIPAA — a genuine, real strength scored "ok" above. ThreatLocker figures reflect public ThreatLocker product pages and third-party review aggregators, checked July 2026 — ThreatLocker's pricing is custom-quoted and not published; confirm current module scope and any pricing before publishing. Named products are the property of their respective owners and are shown to illustrate coverage, not a vendor-run benchmark.
Questions, answered
The watch never sleeps
Give us thirty minutes and we'll show you your own posture — gaps, wins, and the two or three things worth fixing first. You keep the assessment either way.