How do they compare?
ThreatLocker isn't weaker antivirus — it's a different model: default-deny application allowlisting that blocks the unknown instead of chasing it. That power comes with real, ongoing policy work someone has to own, and it still isn't email security, identity protection, or a single bill.
30 minutes · nothing to install · get the assessment free
What to consider when comparing us to ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker's Application Control model — block everything by default, allow only what's approved — is a genuinely more restrictive approach than signature-based AV, and ThreatLocker itself recommends running it alongside an EDR/AV engine, not instead of one. The real cost is operational: every allow-rule is a decision someone has to make and maintain.
ThreatLocker controls what can execute on a device. It has no native email security and no identity threat detection for Entra ID or Okta account compromise — those get sourced from other vendors, separately.
Independent reviews describe a 60–90+ day ramp to operational proficiency, and cases of MSPs accumulating hundreds of policies that became difficult to manage. The model is sound — the question is who authors and maintains the ruleset indefinitely.
Cyber Hero provides 24/7 support for application-approval requests as part of the core product — genuinely useful. Full managed detection and response to Detect module alerts (Cyber Hero MDR) is a separate add-on layered on top, not bundled by default.
The core five-module bundle (Allowlisting, Ringfencing, Elevation Control, Storage Control, Network Control) is solid — but Patch Management, Web Control, Cloud Control, ZTNA, and MDR are each separate, additionally priced modules.
Three reasons to choose EntraGuard over — or alongside — ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker's core bundle stops at execution control — Patch Management, Web Control, Cloud Control, ZTNA, and MDR are each separate, additionally priced modules layered on top. EntraGuard delivers endpoint containment through Detect alongside identity, email, patch, dark-web monitoring, and training — through the same portfolio and the same specialist team. Add a capability and you add a module, not a new vendor or a new contract.
ThreatLocker's own reviewers point to a real ramp period and ongoing policy governance to avoid alert fatigue. EntraGuard's model puts a managed team on that ongoing tuning and triage work, not left for your own staff to build up over months.
ThreatLocker's dashboards give configuration-risk visibility scoped to the endpoint layer — genuinely useful, but still one layer. EntraGuard rolls the full stack into a single board-ready posture score and one relationship as you add modules — a simpler governance story for a regulated organization that answers to an auditor, not just an IT admin.
See what's still uncovered — identity, email, dark-web exposure, training — and what a specialist team running the whole thing looks like, module by module.
From EntraGuard clients
"Within thirty days, EntraGuard had rolled out an impressive security program that immediately identified and remediated active vulnerabilities and threats."Noah R. — COO, Staffing & Recruiting Firm
"We have been a happy client since 2009. HIPAA was a breeze — the requirements actually fall short of the policies and protection we already had in place, thanks to them."Glen B. — President, NY-area Medical Practices
"EntraGuard has significantly improved our cybersecurity program. Our compliance efforts are now stronger, with more effective management of cybersecurity."James C. — CFO, NY-area Publishing Company
EntraGuard vs. ThreatLocker, 2026
ThreatLocker's default-deny model and compliance-config dashboard are genuine strengths, scored accordingly. This isn't allowlisting vs. no allowlisting — many regulated organizations run both models together.
| Capability | EntraGuard | ThreatLocker |
|---|---|---|
| Next-gen antivirus & EDR | ProtectModular, specialist-operated | Detect module runs alongside EDR/AV, not in place of it |
| 24/7 managed threat hunting & response | DetectBaseline core — full SOC-grade service is separate | Cyber Hero MDR is a paid add-on, not default1 |
| Threats contained, not just alerted | Default once Detect is active | Default-deny blocks unapproved execution by design |
| Identity threat protection | IdentityEntra ID core — deeper governance is an add-on | No native Entra ID/Okta compromise detection |
| Email security | ProtectModular | Not offered |
| Patch & device management | ProtectModular | Patch Management is a separate add-on module2 |
| Dark-web credential monitoring | ProtectModular | Not a native capability |
| Security-awareness training | ProtectModular, measured | Admin/product training only, no end-user phishing sim |
| Continuous compliance evidence | ComplyModular | DAC dashboard maps configs to NIST, CMMC, HIPAA3 |
| Single posture score | InsightCore — reflects what's connected | Endpoint-config risk score, not whole-stack |
| A team running it for you | Specialist operation, not self-service | Cyber Hero helps approvals — policy authorship stays on you |
| One vendor, one bill | Yes — one relationship as you add modules | Core bundle plus per-module add-ons |
1 — Cyber Hero MDR (ThreatLocker's fully-managed detection-and-response service on top of Detect-module alerts) is a separate, additionally-priced add-on to the core allowlisting bundle. 2 — ThreatLocker's core five-module bundle (Allowlisting, Ringfencing, Elevation Control, Storage Control, Network Control) doesn't include Patch Management — it's priced and sold separately, alongside Web Control, Cloud Control, and ZTNA. 3 — ThreatLocker's Defense Against Configurations (DAC) dashboard maps endpoint configuration to compliance frameworks including NIST, CMMC, and HIPAA — a genuine strength, scored accordingly. ThreatLocker figures reflect public ThreatLocker product pages and third-party review aggregators, checked July 2026 — ThreatLocker's pricing is custom-quoted and not published, confirm current module scope and any pricing before publishing. Named products are the property of their respective owners and are shown to illustrate coverage, not a vendor-run benchmark.
Questions, answered
The watch never sleeps
Give us thirty minutes and we'll show you your own posture — gaps, wins, and the two or three things worth fixing first. You keep the assessment either way.